Webinar: American Attacks in the Caribbean: War on drugs or regional intervention?
In recent weeks, the United States military—under the Trump administration’s orders—has repeatedly attacked small boats off the Caribbean and Pacific coasts of Venezuela and Colombia under the pretext of combating “narcoterrorism,” killing at least 60 civilians. Yet, to date, the administration has presented zero evidence to justify any aspect of what appear to be clear violations of international law—even as it repositions troops and aircraft carriers to the Caribbean.
The administration’s bellicose actions, rhetoric, and military maneuvers have provoked alarm about the real aims of U.S. escalation, including possible attempts at hostile regime change in Venezuela. Regional leaders, such as Colombia’s Gustavo Petro, have spoken out strongly against the attacks, characterizing them as “murder,” and drawing ire—and a steep tariff increase—from Trump.
Take a listen to our recent webinar: American Attacks in the Caribbean: War on drugs or regional intervention?
Panelists include:
Francesca Emanuele – Analyst of U.S. foreign policy toward Latin America and the Caribbean, expert in human rights, democracy, and regional development. Francesca has closely followed initiatives in the U.S. Congress aimed at curbing unauthorized military interventions by the Executive Branch in Venezuela and other countries.
Alí Bantú Ashanti – Afro-Colombian lawyer and activist, is the founder of Justicia Racial, with over 20 years of work alongside Afro-descendant, Indigenous, and grassroots communities. Alí has worked closely with “boatmen,” fishermen, sailors, and small-time smugglers in coastal communities like those where others like them have been detained, or even killed in military operations.Our expert panelists will analyze possible human rights and international law violations stemming from the indiscriminate and extraterritorial use of lethal force at sea; highlight the social and humanitarian harm caused by maritime militarization in coastal and impoverished communities, who are recurrent victims of the so-called “war on drugs”; and foster informed public debate on the defense of regional sovereignty, multilateralism, and the protection of fundamental human rights.
The Colombia Project: Peace, Democracy, and People-to-People Solidarity
Since the late 1990s, Global Exchange has stood in solidarity with the Colombian people. From the bloodiest years of the internal armed conflict to the historic 2016 Peace Agreement and the current shift toward social justice, our mission has remained the same: to protect human rights, ensure transparency, and amplify the voices building a nation from the ground up.
Today, Colombia stands at a crossroads. As we approach the 2026 electoral cycle, the stakes for peace and sovereignty have never been higher.
Colombia 2026: Monitoring the Electoral Cycle
Global Exchange is monitoring Colombia’s 2026 electoral cycle through data partnerships, field engagement, and democratic analysis.
We stand with the Colombian people during a decisive electoral cycle. In the face of challenges to peace and social justice, Global Exchange is activating electoral monitoring tools to help document the process, support transparency, protect human rights, and amplify the voices that are building the nation from the ground up.
In 2026, Colombia returns to the polls at a moment of profound reckoning. After years of working to support peace implementation and protect social leaders, our mission is once again deployed to document, observe, and speak out. We are not merely observers. Global Exchange is part of a broader international network committed to people-to-people solidarity. From the March legislative elections to the presidential votes in May and June, our commitment is to electoral transparency and the safety of those exercising their right to vote in the country’s most vulnerable regions.
Global Exchange, together with our partners in Colombia, is documenting and analyzing what is at stake in this election for the future of democracy, peace, and sovereignty across Latin America. The 2026 election in Colombia is not just a date at the polls, but a defining moment for the sovereignty of Latin America in the face of resurgent interventionist policies. Within the framework of what some analysts are calling the ‘Donroe Doctrine’ (an aggressive update of the Monroe Doctrine), the Colombian electoral cycle is threatened by a vision that reduces the region to a chessboard for controlling resources and security for external interests. This influence is deeply harmful, as it prioritizes resource extraction and the militarization of territory over social justice and the Colombian people’s right to self-determination. In the face of political violence and diplomatic pressure, international monitoring plays an important role in helping ensure that decisions about the future of peace and human rights in Colombia remain in the hands of the Colombian people.
Colombia’s elections matter not only for Colombians but for the broader region and international partners. The political direction that emerges from this electoral cycle will shape migration patterns, economic relationships, peace implementation, and regional security.
Photo by: Marlene Velasco-Begue
Photo by: Marlene Velasco-Begue
Photo by: Marlene Velasco-Begue
Photo by: Marlene Velasco-Begue
Photo by: Marlene Velasco-Begue
Photo by: Marlene Velasco-Begue
Photo by: Marlene Velasco-Begue
Photo by: Marlene Velasco-Begue
Why Colombia Matters: The Global Context
Colombia’s 2026 elections are not just another news story from abroad. They directly affect American lives, security, and economic interests in ways most people do not realize. Here is what is at stake.
Migration and Regional Stability: Colombia as a Critical Buffer
Here is a number that may surprise you. Colombia is currently hosting nearly 3 million Venezuelan refugees and migrants on its own soil. That is roughly the population of Chicago. These are people who fled hunger, political collapse, and violence in their neighboring country. Colombia has opened its doors while managing its own internal challenges.
This policy has had consequences far beyond Colombia’s borders.
Colombia’s willingness and capacity to absorb this population has reduced migration pressures moving north. In practical terms, millions of people who might otherwise be heading toward the United States border have instead found refuge in Colombia. The country has functioned as a regional stabilizer, absorbing the shock of Venezuela’s crisis.
But that stability is under strain. In 2025, Colombia lost approximately 70 percent of its humanitarian funding. Public services are stretched. Communities hosting migrants are feeling the pressure. If Colombia’s capacity weakens, or if the next government scales back its commitment to protection, migration pressures will not disappear. They will shift.
The International Rescue Committee recently placed Colombia on its 2026 Emergency Watchlist because of this volatility. The organization warned of the potential for a new and major economic crisis and displacement out of Venezuela, coupled with risks of escalating internal conflict. When instability rises in Venezuela, Colombia is the country absorbing the shock.
A Strategic Economic Partner
The U.S. and Colombia have one of the strongest economic relationships in the Western Hemisphere:
The United States remains Colombia’s principal trading partner, accounting for around 30 % of that country’s exports.
U.S. investment and business activity support jobs and economic linkages in both countries, making Colombia a key market for American goods and services.
This is not abstract trade policy. It is about jobs, investment, and market confidence on both sides.
Political instability in Colombia would directly affect trade flows, foreign investment, and long term economic planning. Stability strengthens commercial ties. Uncertainty weakens them. For American companies operating in agriculture, manufacturing, logistics, and services, Colombia is an important and reliable partner.
Peace and Democracy: Progress at a Crossroads
Colombia’s 2016 Peace Agreement formally ended more than five decades of armed conflict that resulted in approximately 450,000 deaths and millions of victims of displacement, forced disappearance, and systematic violence. It marked a historic turning point.
But peace is not self sustaining. It requires continuous implementation, political will, and institutional strength.
Observers note that the peace process has entered a critical stage. Gains are real but fragile. The international community, including the United States, has invested heavily in supporting democratic institutions, rural development, and transitional justice.
A return to widespread instability would not only harm Colombians. Prolonged conflict fuels migration, disrupts trade, and creates space for criminal networks that operate across borders. Instability does not remain contained within one country. A stable and democratic Colombia aligns directly with American strategic interests.
The credibility and inclusiveness of the 2026 elections will shape whether Colombia deepens peace or risks renewed fragmentation.
Security Cooperation & Shared Challenges
For decades, Colombia has been one of the United States’ closest security partners in the hemisphere, particularly in efforts to combat drug trafficking and transnational organized crime.
Colombia produces a majority of the world’s cocaine supply, and a significant portion ultimately reaches the United States. Electoral outcomes will influence how Colombia approaches counternarcotics policy in the years ahead.
The current government has emphasized a shift away from forced eradication of small farmers, focusing instead on targeting major criminal networks, promoting voluntary crop substitution, and strengthening rural development.The stated goal is to significantly reduce production through structural reform rather than solely military intervention.
Opposition leaders advocate a return to a more aggressive security centered strategy. This approach emphasizes rapid security operations, aerial eradication, and expanded international military cooperation. Similar strategies in the past have been widely criticized for their limited long term effectiveness and for the disproportionate impact they had on impoverished rural communities.
Colombian voters will ultimately decide between these competing visions. The outcome will shape how bilateral counternarcotics cooperation evolves, how resources are allocated, and which policy tools are prioritized. Those choices have direct implications for public health, law enforcement, and community safety in the United States.
Geopolitical Influence & Strategic Alignment
Colombia’s geography, economy, and political evolution make it one of the most important partners of the United States in South America. As global competition intensifies and relationships with countries such as China expand across the region, Colombia’s foreign policy direction carries broader strategic weight.
The government that emerges from the 2026 elections will help determine how Colombia engages with Washington on trade, security, regional diplomacy, and multilateral cooperation. Those decisions will shape the broader balance of influence in Latin America.
This is why Global Exchange is present on the ground, documenting, observing, and amplifying Colombian voices. When Colombians vote, the consequences extend beyond their borders.
Democracy anywhere deserves attention everywhere.
📍 What Global Exchange Is Monitoring
As Colombia prepares for legislative and presidential elections in 2026, Global Exchange is launching a sustained monitoring and analysis initiative focused on electoral integrity, civic participation, and democratic resilience.
Through partnerships with civil society organizations, data initiatives, and regional experts, we provide ongoing analysis of risks, opportunities, and democratic trends shaping Colombia’s political future.
📅 Legislative Elections: March 8, 2026
🗳 Presidential Election: May 31, 2026
🔁 Potential Runoff: June 21, 2026
Our monitoring connects data, field realities, and regional analysis.
Data Tools Supporting Democratic Prevention
Turning complex data into accessible insight.
Global Exchange supports and collaborates with initiatives that strengthen transparency and prevention through open data.
We have accompanied regional processes aimed at strengthening citizen participation and the defense of democratic spaces. Within this framework, in May 2025 we held the hemispheric gathering “Democracies Under Attack: From Crisis to Strategy” in Guatemala. The event brought together more than 140 participants from 13 countries—including activists, academics, journalists, and social organizations—to analyze a phenomenon affecting the entire region: democratic backsliding and the rise of authoritarian practices.
Over three days, we shared a diagnosis that remains highly relevant today: democracy faces multiple and simultaneous risks, including:
Political and military interference by the United States
The advance of authoritarianism
Political violence
The instrumentalization of information
Institutional fragility
The growing vulnerability of territories facing complex political and humanitarian dynamics
But from that gathering, we also learned something essential: democratic crises are not confronted with discourse alone. They are confronted with strategy. With data. With cooperation. With innovation. And it was there that one of the strongest consensus points emerged: the need to build tools that transform scattered information into real prevention capacity.
As Colombia approaches a new electoral cycle, organized and accessible information becomes essential to strengthening prevention efforts and increasing transparency throughout the process.
This initiative reflects a key principle: civil society does not only denounce risks — it builds solutions.
Featured Initiative: Datos Para Decidir
Datos Para Decidir is an open platform that transforms complex data into rigorous analysis and accessible tools to support informed decision-making around democracy, humanitarian risk, territory, and social development.
Developed with methodological rigor and designed for broad accessibility, the platform begins with Colombia while projecting a broader vision for Latin America.
By translating technical information into public insight, the platform helps:
Identify risk trends early
Strengthen civic oversight
Improve transparency
Support prevention efforts
Risk Dashboard & Electoral Analysis Application
Developed in collaboration withCESJUL and 3iS, this tool integrates territorial indicators, electoral trends, and risk factors into an accessible dashboard designed for researchers, journalists, and civil society actors.
Open data strengthens democratic accountability.
Accessible data strengthens democratic participation.
The following piece was originally published by Peace and Justice Newsletter of Burlington. The author, Robin Lloyd, is a filmmaker and peace activist from Burlington VT.
I first smoked marijuana when I was thirty years old. I found it to be more fun than alcohol. And more spiritual. It reminded me why I became a Quaker. It helped me see the inner light in people.
The next realization was that it was insane to make this simple plant illegal. In reading books on the subject I learned a surprising fact: the legal prohibition of cannabis, coca and poppy plants is determined at the highest level, not by God (since after all it is reported that Jesus used a cannabis extract in healing) but by the UN’s Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961. In 1970, Richard Nixon signed the legislation implementing national prohibition in compliance with the Convention: the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act.
So just to make that clear, US drug policy is determined by a United Nations Convention.
A potentially momentous reconsideration of that Convention will be taking place this April in New York City at the second United National General Assembly Special Session on Drugs (UNGASS).
I attended the first UNGASS in 1998 as part of the effort by the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) to change policy and especially to assert our position that ending the war on drugs is a women’s issue.
Why? There are many things wrong with this War – its racism, its reliance on military solutions – but one not frequently mentioned is its impact on women.
The War on Drugs condones a form of macho violence. In earlier decades, that violence was played out between cops and robbers, then cowboys and Indians, and now the DEA and narco traffickers.
The War allows men to find an excuse to be violent and to militarize societies. Women lose in time of war, no matter what George Bush says. And what are the results of criminalizing a natural human desire to change consciousness? A massive international slush fund of illegal money funding brothels, gun running, bribes, and casinos: all endeavors that are not much fun for women.
The legal enforcement of prohibition leads to racism and punitive incarceration. On the supply side, the chaos caused when Latin American governments, bullied by the US, agree to spray farmers’ land to destroy coca crops – without asking their permission of course – in the middle of a civil war, has been an ongoing environmental tragedy and political disaster.
I accompanied a WILPF delegation to Colombia in 1996 and documented our meetings with the courageous but melancholy victims of the war: women heartbroken that their sons were forced to join a paramilitary group to kill other women’s sons who had joined the guerillas. A high point of our visit was a meeting with the secretary of the Small Coca Farmers Cooperative. Olmyra Morales arrived at our meeting at a human rights center in Bogota carrying a small suitcase. Like an Avon door-to-door saleswoman, she set out the healing lotions and teas made from he coca plant and described their beneficent uses.
A year later, WILPF US, under the leadership of executive director Marilyn Clement, got a grant from the Drug Policy Foundation for a US tour of women survivors of the War on Drugs: North and South. Olmyra came from Colombia, joining a coca farmer from Bolivia and Peru and an African-American former cocaine addict who was HIV positive – Marsha Burnett from Montpelier VT.
On one of the stops on the tour we met with the staff of a anti-drug abuse program in Baltimore. It was an amazing but gentle confrontation between women who grew the crops whose product was destroying the communities in the inner city of Baltimore, and those who had to deal with the effects of this epidemic. Who was to blame? Who was ‘evil’? New insights were gained that day.
The next year Olmyra came back to the US to testify at the first UNGASS on Drugs in 1998, sponsored by the Transnational Institute from the Netherlands. She and Marsha Burnett were chosen from amongst civil society participants to address (from the balcony) hundreds of diplomats making up the UN Committee of the Whole. They spoke as victims of the supply and demand side of this war.
They held hands aloft and said “We together, representing the two criminalized extremes of the drug problem, say that we are united in seeking a sustainable way of life for our communities…”.
It was moving to hear poor women speaking the truth in those august halls. But did anyone really listen? What was the outcome of that first UNGASS? Titled “A Drug-Free World — We Can Do It!”, President Clinton cajoled the rest of the world into increasing the military response to drug use. The US government was happy to assist Latin American countries in acquiring high speed motor boats for interdiction and low cost loans to build prisons for drug offenders (and anyone else who offended the state).
A lot of drugs have passed under the bridge since that time. This April, UNGASS II will take place in a much changed atmosphere. According to the Transnational Institute, UNGASS 2016 is an unparalleled opportunity to put an end to the horrors of the drug war and instead prioritize health, human rights, and safety.WILPF’s attempt to speak truth to power before UNGASS 1 was a low profile, grassroots effort. By contrast, this April, survivors and victims of this war, north and south, will be traveling as part of a much more robust caravan, starting in Honduras, to present their case to the UN. Sponsored by Global Exchange, with a large grant from George Soros’s Open Society, this movement for freedom from government oppression has a chance to be a game changer.
8 years ago here at Global Exchange Reality Tours we began incorporating the fair trade story into our annual departures to address disturbing truths about the global economy. Millions of farmers around the world are facing poverty and starvation because global crop prices have continued to plummet to all-time lows, a worldwide crisis exacerbating problems including malnutrition, family farm closures, and in some cases increased drug cultivation.
In today’s world economy, where profits rule and small-scale producers are left out of the bargaining process, farmers, craft producers, and other workers are often left without resources or hope for their future. Fair Trade helps exploited producers escape from this cycle of poverty.
The tourism industry has seen a growth in both “voluntourism” and philanthropy-based travel, and in 2003 Reality Tours launched its first Fair Harvest tour. The goals; to share the story of fair trade with travelers, to offer a service learning opportunity, to support local community-based tourism initiatives as a promoter of socially responsible travel, to meet and exchange with fair trade certified cooperative farmers, and to inspire our alumni to return committed to supporting the fair trade movement in their own communities and to support our Global Exchange Fair Trade campaigns and Fair Trade craft stores.
Global Exchange Reality Tours highlight the importance of fair trade on commodity crops such as cocoa, coffee, olives, and tea as well as textiles and crafts, and contextualizes the debate between “fair trade” and “free trade” crops and products in Nicaragua, Guatemala, Ecuador, Palestine, India, Nepal, Rwanda and many other countries. Reality Tours provide the opportunity for participants to learn firsthand how:
fair trade producers receive a fair price – a living wage;
forced labor and exploitative child labor (and modern day slavery) are prohibited;
buyers and producers have direct long-term trade relationships;
producers have access to financial and technical assistance;
sustainable production techniques are encouraged and mandated;
working conditions are healthy and safe;
equal employment opportunities are provided for all;
all aspects of trade and production are open to public accountability.
The Fair Trade system benefits over 800,000+ farmers organized into cooperatives and unions in over 48 countries. While the complexities of each country are unique, what fair trade means for communities is often very similar. Fair Trade profits help fund basic education, health care, and general infrastructure in communities, amplifying the dignity of communities who get to stay on their land. Reality Tours fair trade themed trips provide the opportunity for farmers to share their stories with participants. Reality Tours participants who have witnessed firsthand the benefits of fair trade return from their journey inspired by the experience.
Nicaragua Woman Harvesting Coffee Beans
A Cup of Fair Coffee? Let’s take a commodity or two as an example. The United States consumes one-fifth of all the world’s coffee, the largest consumer in the world. But few North Americans realize that agriculture workers in the coffee industry often toil in what can be described as “sweatshops in the fields.”
Many small coffee farmers receive prices for their coffee that are less than the costs of production, forcing them into a cycle of poverty and debt. Fair Trade is a viable solution to this crisis in Nicaragua, assuring consumers that the coffee they drink was purchased under fair conditions. To become Fair Trade certified, an importer must meet stringent international criteria; paying a minimum price per pound, providing much needed credit to farmers, and providing technical assistance such as help transitioning to organic farming.
Fair Trade for coffee farmers in Matalgapa means community development, health, education, and environmental stewardship. Our Fair Harvest programs to Nicaragua provide the historical context for this social and economic vulnerability and absolutely impact people’s purchasing decisions. We’ve been honored to work with the Fair Trade Cooperative CECOCAFEN for years and know that when our delegates return many choose fair trade in their cups. What if that one-fifth of global coffee drinkers all put their purchases where their values are? That would have global repercussions!
Sweet, Sweet Chocolate
Fair Cocoa Harvest in the Dominican Republic
Next, let’s look at chocolate. The six largest cocoa producing countries are Ivory Coast, Ghana, Indonesia, Nigeria, Brazil, and Cameroon. Cocoa has significant effects on the economy and the population in these countries. In Ghana, cocoa accounts for 40% of total export revenues, and two million farmers are employed in cocoa production. The Ivory Coast is the world’s largest cocoa producer, providing 43% of the world’s cocoa. In 2000, a report by the US State Department concluded that in recent years approximately 15,000 children aged 9 to 12 have been sold into forced labor on cotton, coffee and cocoa plantations in the north of the country. A June 15, 2001 document released by the Geneva, Switzerland-based International Labor Organization (ILO) reported that trafficking of children is widespread in West Africa. (For ILO definitions of these labor violations, see ILO Convention 182 on Child Labor ILO Convention 29 on Forced Labor.)
The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) followed up these reports with an extensive study of cocoa farms in the Ivory Coast, Ghana, Nigeria and Cameroon, directly involving over 4,500 producers. The results were released in August 2002. An estimated 284,000 children were working on cocoa farms in hazardous tasks such as using machetes and applying pesticides and insecticides without the necessary protective equipment. Many of these children worked on family farms, the children of cocoa farmers who are so trapped in poverty many make the hard choice to keep their children out of school to work. The IITA also reported that about 12,500 children working on cocoa farms had no relatives in the area, a warning sign of trafficking.
Child laborers face arduous work, as cacao pods must be cut from high branches with long-handled machetes, split open, and their beans scooped out. Children who are involved in the worst labor abuses come from countries including Mali, Burkina Faso, and Togo — nations that are even more destitute than the impoverished Ivory Coast.
Vicious Circle of Poverty
Rwanda Women's Coffee Cooperative Sorting Beans
Parents in these countries sell their children to traffickers believing that they will find honest work once they arrive in Ivory Coast and then send their earnings home. But once separated from their families, the young boys are made to work for little or nothing. The children work long and hard — they head into the fields at 6:00 in the morning and often do not finish until 6:30 at night. These children typically lack the opportunity for education, leaving them with no way out of this cycle of poverty. The IITA noted that 66% of child cocoa workers in the Ivory Coast did not attend school. About 64% of children on cocoa farms are under age 14, meaning that the loss of an education comes at an early age for the majority of children on cocoa farms. (Watch The Dark Side of Chocolate, a powerful documentary on this issue).
Producer income remains low because major chocolate and cocoa processing companies have refused to take any steps to ensure stable and sufficient prices for cocoa producers. World cocoa prices fluctuate widely and have been well below production costs in the last decade. Though cocoa prices have shown moderate increases in the past few years, cocoa producers remain steeped in debt accumulated when prices were below production costs.
Producers typically also get only half the world price, as they must use exploitative middlemen to sell their crop. The effects of insufficient cocoa income have been exacerbated by deregulation of agriculture in West Africa, which abolished commodity boards across the region, leaving small farmers at the mercy of the market. This economic crisis forced farmers to cut their labor costs. The outcome was a downward spiral for labor in the region, and a surge in reports of labor abuses ranging from farmers pulling children out of school to work on family farms to outright child trafficking and slavery. These small farmers and their children remained trapped in a cycle of poverty, without hope for sufficient income or access to basic education or health care.
We Can Change It! For years, US chocolate manufacturers have claimed they are not responsible for the conditions on cocoa plantations since they don’t own them. But the $13 billion chocolate industry is heavily consolidated, with just two firms — Hershey’s and M&M/Mars — controlling two-thirds of the US chocolate candy market. Surely, these global corporations have the power and the ability to reform problems in the supply chain. What they lack is the will.
At Global Exchange, we know there is a solution – supporting Fair Trade cocoa and chocolate. Fair Trade chocolate and cocoa products are marked with the “Fair Trade Certified” label. Fair Trade cocoa comes from Belize, Bolivia, Cameroon, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Ghana, Nicaragua, and Peru. Thus Reality Tours has a Cocoa Fair Harvest program in the Dominican Republic. Every year, we encourage chocolate lovers from around the world to join with our local partners from Grupo CONACADO to explore benefits of Fair Trade cocoa and sustainable harvest, renewable technology in the Dominican Republic.
Palestine Fair Olive Harvest, Group with Farmers 2009
Fair Trade Tourism is a growing segment of our socially responsible travel program here at Global Exchange. Our third Fair Harvest destination was announced in 2007 to Palestine where participants worked side by side Palestinians harvesting olives. The Fair Trade story continues to evolve and we look forward to expanding our Reality Tours programs in the years to come. There is an opportunity for those of us in the tourism industry to make a positive change in the world. Tourism can be a force for good. We can ensure tourism dollars stay to benefit the local economies of our hosts. We can highlight the stories, the struggles and aspirations of the communities we visit. Together with Reality Tours trip participants, we can be a force for fairness.
This piece was originally written by Malia Everette for Tourism Review, Tourism Magazine Review October 2010 issue.
The following post was written by California Fair Trade Coalition Director, Tim Robertson. Take action today by calling your Representative and tell them NO on Free Trade Agreements with Colombia, Korea, and Panama.
This week President Obama said he understood “the frustration” moving thousands of ordinary citizens to take to the streets of dozens of American cities. But that didn’t keep him from kicking them under the table by sending three pending NAFTA-style trade deals to Congress, despite his campaign promises to oppose them.
With a vote expected tomorrow, it’s up to activists from around the country to let their Members of Congress know that these pro-corporate deals cost jobs and marginalize the workers and the poor in all involved countries, while greasing the wheels for offshoring and further deregulating our financial services industry. The pacts, originally negotiated by President Bush, are expected to cost hundreds of thousands of jobs and we only have hours left to stop them.
Call 1-800-718-1008 to be connected to your Representative to tell them NO on Free Trade Agreements with Colombia, Korea, and Panama.
When you hear the President speak of these deals, you’d think they were job a creating magic box that will restore the manufacturing sector and set us up for years of advantageous competition in Asia. Of course, when you look inside the box, you find that the U.S. International Trade Commission expects them to expand the trade deficit and cost hundreds of thousands of jobs in, you guessed it, the manufacturing sector.
This shouldn’t be too big of a surprise, as we’ve learned from NAFTA that not only do these types of deals eliminate working class jobs on both sides of the border, but they outline a broad swath of extraordinary corporate rights used to subjugate workers and the planet for profit. Free Trade is just one more mechanism that the 1% use to consolidate their power. And they’re trying to expand it right under our noses. Call 1-800-718-1008 to tell your Representative to vote NO.
These FTAs are about corporations vs. people, the CEOs vs. the workers, the 1% vs. the 99%.
Under the guise of “opening up markets,” free trade agreements like these are giant corporate handouts that enable job offshoring, deregulate financial services, and empower corporations to challenge public interest laws as basic as minimum wage and environmental protections. Get this, in order to receive restitution, corporation need only prove that domestic laws “expropriated” expected profits – you can’t make this stuff up.
Call now, 1-800-718-1008.
The very nature of free trade leads to a “race to the bottom” on regulatory issues, as producers seek the cheapest environments to make goods, and in the corporate world that means the place with the worst labor laws and environmental regulation. Many countries lower such standards to attract investment and corporations are more than happy to take advantage of the cheaper environment, frequently offshoring U.S. jobs.
No where is this more apparent than in Colombia. Since 1986, over 2800 trade unionists have been murdered in Colombia, often by corporate and/or state backed paramilitary groups. To this day, Colombia is the most dangerous country in the world to try to organize a union, with 51 union organizers murdered in 2010 alone, more than in the rest of the world combined.
In Panama, opaque banking laws and low corporate tax rates have made the country a tax haven, home to 400,000 registered corporations for a population of just 4 million. Many of these firms are just US shell corporations hiding money for tax purposes. And we want to deregulate financial services exchanges with this country?
In the South Korea deal, American pharmaceutical companies negotiated higher prices for medicines purchased by the Korean single-payer health care, threatening the viability the system. Meanwhile, US car companies are allowed to sell cars in Korea that don’t even meet Korean emission standards. And some would suggest that these deals improve public health and are good for the environment?
I don’t think so. By definition, these deals are for the benefit of those with the resources to move capital (or jobs) from one country to another. As the Occupy Wall Street protests are highlighting, that’s only 1%. Join the 99% by fighting back on these trade deals today, because literally, tomorrow is too late.
Call your Representative TODAY at 1-800-718-1008.
** Download the .pdf of the full report in Spanish here and here.
Election Day Voting in Juan de Acosta, Colombia
Global Exchange led an observation mission in Colombia in February 2010. The mission was integrated by 22 observers from 7 countries and visited municipalities in Antioquia, Córdoba, Valle del Cauca and Santander to conduct interviews with different social actors, including representatives of political parties, local grassroots organizations, and government officials. One of the main complaints received by the mission concerned the illegal use of a social welfare program called “Familias en Acción” by civil servants and local politicians for electoral purposes. These complaints served as the motivation for this study, which is an analysis of “Familias en Acción” and its impact on Colombian elections.
Global Exchange held a press conference on Monday in Colombia presenting the groundbreaking report. The full report can be found in its entirety in Spanish here and here. including a General Summary and statistical graphs. English readers can read the Press Release for Monday’s conference here.
You can also see the livetweets in Spanish from the Monday press conference on Global Exchange’s twitter feed or search the hashtag: #GlobalFA
The press conference and report has drawn a lot of attention from Colombian press. The articles have been collected on our Colombia Elections Updates page.
For those visuals folks, you can tune into a short video produced by Rob Davenport for CounterCamera Films, in association with Global Exchange.
Colombia’s 2010 presidential elections are a watershed moment. This film short presents a mosaic of viewpoints on whether conditions for equitable and coercion-free elections exist in Colombia. These voices include a state governor, a mayor of a large city, a presidential candidate, neighborhood youth, a protected witness, and the President of the National Electoral Commission.
Stay tuned to our Colombia Elections Updates page for ongoing news about the elections, including the runoff elections scheduled for June 20th.
Photo Credit: Rainforest Action Network
As a student, former Military Intelligence Officer, and veteran, I’ve spent the last six years studying political violence and its causes.
Simply put, when the process of dialogue between disputing parties breaks down and the aggrieved party is denied recourse through the political and legal systems, its members take the next logical step, which military theorist Carl von Clausewitz describes as the “continuation of politics by other means.”
This can be observed in places such as Iraq and Nigeria, developing nations which have three things in common: oil, governments that rely more on fear than representation to maintain power, and foreign investors who collude with these governments in order to gain access that resource.
In the case of Iraq this has led to sectarian conflict and attacks on U.S. troops, who are in the position of having to preserve a fragile security situation while Chevron and other companies attempt to quietly exploit their window of opportunity to re-enter the country.
Nigeria, in comparison, has lost up to 25% of its oil production capacity due to insurgent attacks in the Niger Delta, where Chevron contaminates the air and water with impunity and has directly supported the Nigerian military in its brutal operations against peaceful demonstrators. Faced with the devastation of their food and water supply and the failure of their governments to hold these companies accountable, it is not difficult to understand why citizens of these countries turned to armed conflict in order to change the companies’ cost-benefit analysis.
On May 26 at Chevron’s annual shareholder meeting, I witnessed Chevron refused entry to proxy shareholders from Ecuador, Burma, Nigeria, Colombia, and numerous other places around the world which have been severely harmed by the company. I cannot help but wonder what these individuals’ communities will think after they return from thousands of miles of travel without having been afforded the opportunity to make a simple statement before Chevron’s new CEO and Board of Directors: treat us like human beings.
The air was thick with contempt in front of Chevron’s Houston headquarters as these individuals were escorted out by smirking security officials after being informed that their papers did not meet the company’s qualifications for entry. My thought, watching these community leaders exit the building in compliance, was that Chevron had just made a major strategic miscalculation.
We in the U.S. are fortunate enough to still have a political system which, however frustrating it can often be, still makes it possible to effect change through peaceful political and legal means. Chevron is an American company. Therefore we have a responsibility to hold it accountable for its human rights violations around the world and to impose political and financial costs on it for these violations.
Through a series of long term regulatory and policy battles we will make it increasingly costly for companies such as Chevron to operate with impunity and simultaneously make renewable alternatives more attractive to investors, the ultimate objective being to bring the power of energy production back into the hands of the people. The technology to accomplish this exists today. Our challenge is to win over or oust those politicians who stand in our way through the electoral process.
Our security, our democracy, and our moral authority in the world are at stake in what we will look back on as one of the great political battles of the 21st century.
T.J. Buonomo is a Chevron Program Associate with Global Exchange and founder and editor of Citizens for a Sovereign and Democratic Iraq. He is a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy and former Military Intelligence Officer, U.S. Army.