Behind the Bukele Myth

Take a list to our live cast from El Salvador (in English) to bring you closer to the grim realities on the ground “Behind the Bukele Myth.”

The live cast brought together several experts, including John Guliano, director of the Tamarindo Foundation, a youth development center in Guarjila, Chaletenango. His (entirely innocent) co-director was arbitrarily arrested nearly three months ago and has been jailed and deprived of any semblance of due process ever since.

We were also joined by Noah Bullock of Cristosal, one of the leading Human Rights organizations in El Salvador. He gave us a picture of the deteriorating human and civil rights conditions countrywide.

Investigative journalists Michael Fox and Manuel Ortiz – both friends of and collaborators with Global Exchange also shared their experiences and insights. Global Exchange Human Rights director Ted Lewis moderated.

Join us in honor of Romero’s legacy in defense of the Salvadoran people’s right to organize in the face of militarized repression!

March 27 marks two years since Nayib Bukele suspended constitutional rights in El Salvador under an emergency measure known as the State of Exception, following a weekend spike in gang homicides. Since then, the measure has been used to arrest over 78,000 people without warrants, including union leaders, student organizers, environmental activists, land defenders and parents of victims who have been outspoken against their children’s disappearance.

Tune in to this panel, organized in collaboration with The CISPES Solidarity with El Salvador, with popular movement leaders and human rights defenders in El Salvador, journalists, solidarity organizers and human rights advocates about:

Fraud during recent elections in El Salvador that allowed Bukele to secure another term – in violation of the constitution.

How the Bukele regime is using military and police repression to target communities where there is organized resistance.

How economic exploitation is fueling a new wave of displacement.

The Biden administration’s continued demonstrations of political support along with police and military aid to Bukele.

The end of March also marks 44 years since U.S.-backed death squads killed Salvadoran archbishop Saint Oscar Arnulfo Romero following his open letter to President Jimmy Carter defending the right of the organized masses to resist their exploitation and questioning U.S. financing of brutal repression by El Salvador’s security forces.

Let’s learn about the relevance of Romero’s legacy in defense of El Salvador’s mass organizations in the 70s given the current situation in El Salvador and the role of international solidarity today!

We turn our focus to the underreported armed conflict on the Chiapas-Guatemala border. This conflict, fueled by territorial disputes among organized crime groups, has devastating consequences for the largely Indigenous population of Chiapas. The communities displaced by the violence are in the thousands, and violence and terror have become part of daily life.
Join us for an important discussion with Chloé Stevenson, a human rights defender with Centro de Derechos Humanos Fray Bartolomé de las Casas (Frayba), as we delve into the complexities of this crisis and the urgent need for international solidarity. Stevenson, along with a coalition of organizations, published a report: Siege of Daily Life, Terror for Territorial Control, and Serious Human Rights Violation.

Siege on everyday life, terror for territorial control and serious human rights violations. Report from civil society organizations in Chiapas on violence in the border region. 

The Chiapas-Guatemala border has been affected since around 2021 by an unrecognized armed conflict based on the territorial dispute of organized crime structures fighting for control over goods, services, individuals, legal and illegal products, as well as the lives of the local population. This zone, known as the Frontera region, includes the municipalities of La Trinitaria, Frontera Comalapa, Chicomuselo, Siltepec, Escuintla, Motozintla, Mazapa de Madero, El Porvenir, La Grandeza, Bejucal de Ocampo, Amatenango de la Frontera and Bella Vista.

The turning point that reveals the dispute between criminal groups in the state is the events that occurred on July 7, 2021. On that day, Gilberto Rivera, “El Junior,” son of the operator of one of the organized crime groups that maintained control in the state, was assassinated. His murder was claimed by the antagonistic criminal group.

Due to its geographical location and strategic natural resources, Chiapas is a key territory for the control and promotion of both legal and illegal economies. It is important to note that the region, with a predominantly Indigenous population, has been historically abandoned by the Mexican State. The border zone, at the epicenter of the current violence crisis, is home to an Indigenous population from the Mam community, a mixed-race population, as well as Jacalteco, Q’anjob’al, Akateko, and Quichéccommunities, some of which are descendants of the Guatemalan exile of the 1980s.

The year 2023 has witnessed several significant peaks of violence. Notably, there was the “four-day war” in May, where organized crime groups clashed in the community of Nueva Independencia, also known as Lajerío, affecting neighboring communities, all within the municipality of Frontera Comalapa. The “four-day war” resulted in approximately 3,500 people being forcibly displaced from their communities, jeopardizing their lives, safety, and personal integrity.

Throughout the last year and up to the present date, the civilian population has been taken hostage, used as a shield, and forced to participate in mobilizations, blockades, and confrontations in support of one of the disputing factions. Basic supplies such as food, gasoline, gas, electricity, or telephone services have been cut off, keeping the population in suspense and distress, isolated, facing food shortages, and unable to move. Additionally, the phenomenon of disappearances is a matter of great concern. It is challenging to document in the border zone due to the scarcity of reports stemming from the lack of trust in authorities and the fear to which the population is subjected. However, even official figures reveal an increase.

According to the documentation that serves as the basis for this report, criminal groups employ various strategies to gain control of the territory. Documented tactics include widespread and recurring confrontations, continuous surveillance, and physical occupation of private plots that even displace individuals from their lands, among others. Similarly, these groups focus on controlling the population through actions aimed at fostering social acceptance, using persuasive strategies, but also resorting to violence, such as forced recruitment.

The “economía de conflicto” established in the area includes the dispossession of the population, an increase in extortion, the closure of businesses, and the sexual exploitation of girls and women, with significant economic, social, and psychological impacts. In general, people living in the area see almost every aspect of their daily lives affected, and it is not always easy to identify the motives of the present groups.

At the institutional level, it is evident that organized crime has infiltrated health services, garbage collection, government administrative units, food supply, and education at various levels, among others. The control over these institutions is ambivalent, and depending on the group and the state of conflict in the zone, it can shift from cooptation and financing to situations where institutions must remain either closed or open despite ongoing confrontations.

The consequences of terror and the control of individuals and territories are devastating for the populations. Thousands of people have been forced to relocate, making it difficult to document the numbers and destinations precisely. However, we can assert that a combination of physical, economic, psychological, and sexual violence has led to the internal displacement of at least 7,500 individuals in the region between June 2021 and November 2023. In some communities, approximately 15% of the population is reported to have been forcibly displaced. These forms of control and infiltration also weaken and fragment social and peasant organizations, destroying and manipulating decision-making dynamics and internal sanctions, ultimately eroding the profound sense of community life.

The practices of organized crime groups in the border region of Chiapas create a widespread situation of serious human rights violations whose implications undermine the most basic sense of humanitarian protection. Assessing these impacts can be problematic at first glance, as it is not state agents directly violating human rights. Furthermore, there is no official recognition of an internal armed conflict (Non-International Armed Conflict) in the zone. However, there are armed groups with the capacity to generate severe impacts on the lives, dignity, and personal integrity of all residents who are not part of the conflict, whose protection is indeed the responsibility of the Mexican State.

Given this backdrop, state interventions have primarily been characterized by omission, acquiescence, and, in some cases, collaboration. Faced with the widespread vulnerability resulting from the territorial dispute among organized crime groups, the population has repeatedly demanded the urgent intervention of the Ejército Mexicano and the Guardia Nacional. However, in contrast, it has been the inaction and complicity of the state security forces that have led to civilian populations’ demands for their withdrawal from certain zones.

In fact, throughout the conflict-ridden border region, organized crime interacts with government officials, forming criminal structures that intervene and escalate tensions and conflicts over territorial control. The level of infiltration into government structures is such that in some municipal seats, it has been reported that “the entire municipal government is within criminal structures and serves their interests.

Our approach to the current situation in the border region of Chiapas-Guatemala allows us to categorize the conflict as a Non-International Armed Conflict, a perspective supported by the legal framework of International Humanitarian Law.

Here is a link to the full report (Spanish). 

People are starving to death in Gaza. In fact, 80% of all people starving in the world right now are in Gaza because of the brutal and unceasing attack from Israel’s armed forces. More than 25,000 Palestinians are already dead.

It is time to massively increase food and humanitarian supplies, not deal them a death blow like the United States, United Kingdom, France, Japan, and Germany are doing by suspending financial support for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA)  – based on allegations of connections to the Hamas attacks on October 7, by a handful of the more than 30,000 relief workers UNRWA employs in Gaza.

UNRWA has been vital to millions of Palestinian refugees displaced since the 1948 Palestine War.  As of 2019, more than 5.6 million Palestinians have registered with them. Cutting them off now during the worst humanitarian crisis ever to beset Gaza is inhumane and despicable, no matter what a few misguided souls may – or may not – have done on October 7th.

We’re calling on President Biden to put your money where your mouth is: restore full-funding to UNRWA and demand a CEASEFIRE NOW! Sign the petition today to send an immediate message to President Biden!

We will not be divided.  Our movement will not be broken.

Ayotzinapa, Guerrero, Mexico
December 18, 2023

We, the mothers and fathers of the 43 forcibly disappeared students from the Raúl Isidro Burgos School in Ayotzinapa have been witness to the unfounded accusations and defamations by the President of the Republic against members of the Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez Human Rights Center and other civil society organizations that have supported us in demanding the recovery of our children alive. We condemn these lies and affirm our support and approval of their handling of our case and all similar cases.

For almost a full decade, we, the mothers and fathers of the Ayotzinapa 43, have worked closely with Agustín Pro rights defenders and can attest to their commitment to advance our case and the cases of other victims of forced disappearance throughout Mexico faithfully and in accordance with all laws. In the most difficult of times, the Agustín Pro Center has been there encouraging us to pursue the truth, when so many others opted to stand by in silence. This includes the previous government’s farcical public presentation of the so-called historical truth of our case and their obstruction of justice.

The Agustín Pro Center has been fundamental in demonstrating the fabrications in the “historical truth” pronouncements put forth by the Mexican government. Thanks to their work, we know that their account of Ayotzinapa case was based on statements made by individuals under duress of torture. These statements were subsequently determined to be false by the 19th Circuit First Collegiate Court of Reynosa, Tamaulipasin 2017, which also recognized our status as victims and the violation of our rights. Those proceedings also led to the creation of an Investigative Commission for Truth and Justice for the case of Iguala and the Commission for Truth and Access to Justice in the Ayotzinapa case (CoVAJ), which we celebrate as victories in our struggle.

It goes without saying that our lawyers demanded the release of those initially detained for the crimes carried out in Ayotzinapa. Nevertheless, it was the work of State Prosecutor Omar Gómez Trejo and the Agustín Pro Center that unearthed the murky and illegal investigative proceedings that led to the construction of the so-called historical truth and the release of those who were made into scapegoats for the disappearance of the Ayotzinapa 43. Thanks to their work, the investigation was redirected towards those that needed to be held accountable.

It is worth recalling that the Army refused the demand of the mothers and fathers of the Ayotzinapa 43 in September of this year to hand over relevant information in its possession. Subsequently, then-Undersecretary of Human Rights Alejandro Encinas ultimately recognized that the army was indeed in possession of this information and that the President has given instruction that it be made available for investigation.However, since Encina’s departure from government, this matter has not only been ignored, but the President has also engaged in a pattern of attacks and disqualifications against the organizations that support and advise the mothers and fathers of the 43 students.

Having established the aforementioned, the accusations that have been leveled against members of the Agustín Pro Center amount to nothing less than an abhorrent slander tactic orchestrated from the highest level of government. Its objectives are to (1) distract the general public’s attention away from the main present issue: the Mexican army’s refusal to provide information related to the Ayotzinapa crimes and the whereabouts of our children, and (2) divide the group of mothers and fathers of the 43 students and thereby weaken our bonds with civil society and human rights organizations that fight for the truth.

We, the mothers and fathers of the Ayotzinapa 43, thus come together to communicate to the government that they will not be divide or dissuade us. We have been through this before. We stayed united as the government tried to discredit the Special Group of Independent Experts, our lawyers, and even us, and we now remain dignified, committed, and strong in demanding the recovery of our children alive. Our conviction to see this case brought to full justice will not change, nor will it change for our team of advisors and representatives, who are guided by professionalism and justice.

No government action can diminish our unity or lead us to abandon our legitimate demands for the return of our children alive and for the Mexican army to do what is legal and right.

Being as such, we reaffirm the following demand to:

Immediately stop all slanders against and vilifications of the Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez Human Rights Center and other civil society organizations.
Immediately stop the authoritarian tactics designed to divide and dissuade usfrom reaching the truth and achieving justice.
Immediately and definitively stop distractions away from the Mexican Army’s legal duty to deliver all information in its possession that is relevant to the case of our missing children.

Signed,

Committee of Mothers and Fathers of the Ayotzinapa 43

The U.S. veto of the UN Security Council Resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza gives a green light for Israel to continue escalating a murderous military campaign that has reached genocidal proportions in Gaza.

This is wrong and the U.S. now stands visibly isolated on the world stage. And our government’s stubborn refusal to help put the brakes on what UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres termed a “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza is not just wrong, it is immoral.

It not only makes us complicit with every atrocity committed by the IDF, it unnecessarily puts us on a collision course with history and people around the world who should be our friends and allies.

For decades the U.S. has used its Security Council veto power to protect Israel from the consequences of its own excesses – like the invasion of Lebanon in the 1980’s, the use of prohibited weapons, decades of settlement on illegally occupied lands – the list is long. Israel has become accustomed to virtually unconditional U.S. backing, but this week’s veto is perhaps the most bitter one yet.

Over 17,000 people have been killed in weeks of brutal and indiscriminate strikes on Gaza in what Israel justifies as retaliation for the brutal October 7th attacks by Hamas. All life is sacred, but the world is not buying Israel’s story. Not when nearly half those killed in its military campaign are children, not when most of Gaza’s homes are already destroyed, not when more than a million internally displaced people fleeing the conflict go hungry, thirsty, unsheltered.

And the gruesome October 7th assault did not suddenly make the deeply corrupt, authoritarian ultra-nationalist Benjamin Netanyahu a wise leader who the U.S. should support even as he bombs and brutalizes the people of Gaza whose grandparents first fled there 1948 and who, since 1967, have lived under military occupation and domination by Israel.

The shock of what happened on October 7th is undisputed, the lessons are not. The U.S. is not obliged to follow Benjamin Netanyahu on an impossible campaign to “exterminate” his enemies. Joining the world in calling for a genuine and prolonged ceasefire is in the long-term best interests of the American people and of everyone involved. Violence begets more violence. New leaders who understand that are desperately needed.

In a statement explaining why he invoked the rarely used Article 99 of the UN Charter that empowers the Secretary-General “to bring to the attention of the Security Council any matter which, in his opinion, may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security,” Guterres lamented the “appalling human suffering, physical destruction and collective trauma across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” He said, “Hospitals have turned into battlegrounds [and that] without shelter or the essentials to survive, I expect public order to completely break down soon.”

The temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas that was abandoned on December 1st should resume. The exchange of captives should resume. The constant deadly bombardment of Gaza must stop; truce and ceasefire must be revived.

Don’t let up the pressure on our leaders. Please tell the White House: Permanent Ceasefire NOW. Call and express your disappointment on today’s ceasefire VETO. America can do better.

Call the White House Today 202-456-1111

*this blog was written on December 8, 2023